Saturday, May 23, 2009

OTT

At Nationals, I saw about five goals (and a lot of excellent leading passes) thrown  in a pretty unconventional way.

High release throws literally over the defender. 

Usually a mainstay of zone offence, this sort of throw I saw pulled out more and more by the elite teams (Fyshwick, Chilly) against a man defence situation, relying generally on the downfield cutter's defender concentrating too hard on the person they are guarding and not the disc or the current thrower.

Spotting height mismatches (or defenders with no read on the disc) and subsequently throwing an overhead, or any other high aerial pass seems to have a stigma of being unprofessional or low percentage. In Vancouver, Lewi Broad (6"4?) marked by a 5"3 14 year old boy from the French juniors team, spent a whole game clogging the endzone yelling 'put it high!' and got in trouble for ruining our offensive structure. Was he in the wrong? All he was really doing was recognising a situation where a high throw into space would have ensured a goal.

Augmenting routine and repetition (the same boring offensive structures every club team in Australia learns by rote) with awareness of empty space on the field and a willingness to be unconventional offensively can lead to reward - not just beating a favourite, but becoming one.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

For Future Reference

Ultimate is truly unique because it is self-refereed, right up to the World Championships.

If you're anything like me (and many of the people that read this blog probably are me) you can probably hear yourself saying the above words to family members, co-workers, teachers, people who eat dessicated coconut silently only to later throw mandarins at you during junior training camps and new players.

The biggest problem I have with referees is, they are only human and are just as liable to make mistakes in their calls as anyone else. Whether having one person with all the power making one set of mistakes on-field is preferable to having fourteen different people all making different mistakes at once remains to be seen.

Regardless of how this issue pans out over time, one thing ultimate could absorb quite happily and easily would be the video referee, for selected calls where it is possible through the magic of technology to be more or less objective. In-bounds/out of bounds calls, disputes as to whether the disc is up or down, arguments as to whether they landed with their back foot first...

Who could possibly have a problem with that?

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Getting positive (or NLP and YOU!)

The other day at SUUFA training we practiced some zone, both offense and defense. The first error I made was putting all the experienced players as handlers. I forgot they should pop and then other people should handle. But this little thought did cross my mind as I was busting that that zone to bits and running an unstoppable stone wall of a cup.

I'm now slightly able bodied and can sort of jog around, so I was able to handle for a while. (Before I realised I should pop) I had the issue my handler buddies not pushing up on the wings when there was a lot of dead space, as the defense zone was overcommiting strong side then the disc was on one side of the field. I tried yelling and pointing frantically but realised how ineffectual this was, so I thought what can I do in this game situation without actaully stopping the whole game and explaining it step by step.

My thought process:
Problem: Left and right handlers do not push up wings in dead space.

How do I fix this? Well I learnt this by having someone yell at me to move up the sideline into open space. Is this an option right now? Not really.

Solution: Throw leading passes in front of them to the point they can barely reach it. They will have to run onto it. Eventually I hope that they will run forwards for it, before I have released it, knowing that it will come there.

Sure, this makes sense when I think about it, rather than making them try to move before I throw the disc, I will just throw it to where I want to throw it and make them get it. After a few swings the left handler still didn't get it, but Christine the right handler did. Unfortunately so did the defense and I got too greedy and it was d'd.

It made me think a little bit afterwards... and thinking. Can NLP(Neuro-linguistic programming read: communicating with the unconscious mind read: hypnosis) be applied to frisbee and other training situations?

People know about Pavlov's dog. A dog was fed food every time a bell rang. When the dog heard the bell it woudl salivate in anticipation for the food. Eventually they could just ring the bell and the dog would salivate without the food actaully being there. This was NLP in practice.

How could this be applied to humans? (Aside from subtle hypnotic suggestion)

I read a book called "Ace on the River," by Barry Greenstein, a famous poker degenerate (www.barrygreenstein) one that I particularly like. His book, unlike many other poker books was about leading a successful poker lifestyle, rather than just playing the game well. It made me realise about 3 chapters in I do not have the character needed to be a really successful poker player. One of the reasons this is for is that I do not have the ability to have the confidence to gamble. eg: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_cze-w4sCA simply put, I would not be able to put $9000 on a bluff, and deal with someone calling with nothing except a draw to a high card. It takes a lot of guts / ridiculous amounts of gamble to do something like this.

Barry in the opening chapter introducing his book recalls one of his reasons for his confidence at the poker table was from playing cards with his mother as a child. I think it might have been rummy, but he always recalled winning when he played with his mother. One day when he was older, he was watching his mum play his brother and saw her hand. It was then that he noticed his mum could have made the winning play, but didn't, instead letting his brother win.

In this case, Barry's unconscious mind has no reason to feel fear while playing games, because it was trained to always win, this has helped him do what seems like crazy things.

So could this sort of NLP training be applied to frisbee training? Of course it could. In fact it already is used everywehre. We use it all the time, its why we congratulate beginners and players for doing something as simple as making a catch or a good throw. The reason although we don't think about, is to associate good feelings to good play. In this way we are communicating with a person's unconscious mind. When we make someone feel good about a throw, we are teaching the persons limbic brain (the one between reptillian which is pure instinct and the neo cortex which made us smarter than all the other animals) that the physical action of throwing the disc in that manner or catching in a certain way is the correct way to do it, even when the person doesn't consciously understand what they are doing. That is why we don't think when we catch and throw most of the time.

So when you're team mates do something good, congratulate them. When you see someone do a perfect throw, make them feel good for doing it. Use this encouragement until success and performance are an expectation every person in the team has in themselves. Harness and create that emotional attachment to success in your team mates, it will help them be driven to improve and succeed.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Clubbed to Death

Prague is vaguely on the horizon of quite a few groups of players.

Among the rumours I have heard concerning how many bids in which divisions Australia will be allocated and which teams are interested, a thought occurred to me.

We haven't yet reached critical mass in the player limit of Australian ultimate. There are no defined 'mixed' players and there are no defined 'opens' players.

The playmakers who dominate in Opens or Womens ultimate in the first half of the year, go on to dominate in the Mixed side of things six months later. This is all well and good (well, actually, it isn't, but that's another blog post) but it does leave some clubs in a bit of a pickle when it comes to competing in the World Ultimate Club Championships in the Czech Republic next year.

Where will Chilly be, if Gack plays for Vintage? (or vice versa)

What will happen to Kaboom if Max and Jonno play for Fyshwick?

What will happen to HoS if, say, Rueben and Owen play for the spookily mysterious second Victorian mixed team wishing to compete at Clubs?

Just something to think about. 

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

So, What Now?

Hooray! As everyone knows, or should know, I hate Opens because it makes me feel small and insignificant, Womens because I'm still somehow not allowed to play it, but my statistically average height makes me feel bigger when there are three women on the field so Mixed is my niche.

What is everyone doing for the Mixed season?

Firstly, the venue: Hobart. As a player I would love to avoid the 'it's too far, it costs too much' excuse that having Nationals in Perth gave us. Frankly, if you didn't go to Nationals in Perth, you are probably the only people who can actually afford going to Tasmania in October, and you have no excuse. Flights (return, admittedly from Sydney) are sub-$200 if you book smartly.

So now. Let's take a look-see at who is going.

Vintage: As defending champions, they have an obligation to attend. Victoria is close to Tasmania, and they want to go to Prague. I'd say they'd be coming back in 09.
FAF: Nobody tells me nothing.
Kaboom: Are these guys interested in Prague? With three full teams last year, I'd say there are bound to be at least two teams from the ACT this year.
Spider-Pig: If the casual league rumours about Tim Gee forming a team are true, I would say Spider-Pig are back. Whether or not they use this moniker is up to them.
Smurf: Who knows? Not I - if they are back, they've lost Pottsy (probably a boon) but maybe also Erin Wallis (would she be playing for Canberra?). How is Joel's shoulder?
Great! Sugoi!: Last year, the Northern region played host, and had their quite considerable (ie, proven ability to make the finals) talent diluted across about five teams. It will be interesting to see what sort of combinations arise.
YOOOUUU!: Definitely the people having the most fun all through last year's tournament, I hope they reform. They may (or may not) have trouble getting the same amount of interstate support, if JmcN is tied up playing for someone else and JD is playing for WA. (see below)
Western Australia?: Sublime surprised everyone with a devastating, speedy game at Nationals, and Kaos, Perth's second women's club, finished the tournament unexpectedly high. WA didn't represent at mixed nats last year, but with the kind of talent they have floating around now, they'd be silly if they didn't show up.
Friskee: Who?

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Save the Environment

Courtesy of Nathan Stacey

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2006/oct/29/features.environment

Make sure you read through to the end.